Criteria and methods in nuclear power plants siting: a systematic literature review

Open

Heni Susiati, Millary Agung Widiawaty, Moh. Dede, Sunardi, Theo Alvin Ryanto, Khairul Handono

2024 Cogent Social Sciences Vol. 10 Issue 1 Review Cited by 10 SDG 7SDG 17 Quartile

Abstract

Site selection for nuclear power plants (NPPs) is an important government policy that has received widespread public attention. This situation led researchers to develop several criteria for determining NPP location. Therefore, our study aims to summarize several criteria and methods associated with NPP siting using systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA). Previous studies published between 2014 and 2021 across three scientific databases (Scopus, EBSCO, and ProQuest) were used. There were 18 articles containing the criteria and methods for NPP siting from screening to inclusion. It was discovered that the siting process involves 7–25 criteria divided into (1) bio-geophysical (BGP), (2) social-economic and policy (SEP), and (3) disaster and extreme event (DEE) aspects. BGP was found to be the main criterion considered to be always present in NPP siting, in particular water coolers. Each SEP and DEE paid more attention to population and seismicity. Furthermore, WLC and AHP were the most widely used (18%), even though our analysis showed 18 other methods to weight each criterion. We found that China (17%, 26%), Turkey (22%, 12%), and Iran (11%, 11%) are very concerned about NPP due to the direct participation of national-affiliated researchers. NPP siting in the future requires a geospatial approach to provide a detailed description. In addition, sensitivity analysis should be used, especially if more than one decision-making method is used. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Affiliations

Directorate for Development Policy, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Central Jakarta, Indonesia; Human Geography, School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom; Cakrabuana Institute for Geoinformation, Environment and Social Studies, Cirebon Regency, Indonesia; Doctoral Program on Environmental Science, Graduate School (SPs), Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung City, Indonesia; Faculty of Social Sciences Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung City, Indonesia; Center for Environment and Sustainability Science, Universitas Padjadjaran, Bandung City, Indonesia; Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA), Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang Regency, Indonesia

Research at a Glance

Premium content — register to unlock

Research at a Glance

Register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Premium content — register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Register to unlock

Collaboration

Premium content — register to unlock

Collaboration

Register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Premium content — register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Register to unlock

References Overview

Premium content — register to unlock

References Overview

Register to unlock

Journal & Source

Premium content — register to unlock

Journal & Source

Register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Premium content — register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Register to unlock