Comparison of electronic transport parameter of CNT(10, 10)/CNT(17,0) and CNT(5,5)/CNT(8,0) carbon nanotube metal-semi conductor on-tube heterojunction

Closed

Sukirno, Satria Zulkarnaen Bisri, Irmelia, Lilik Hasanah, Adi Bagus Suryamas, Ida Usman, Mursal

2006 IEEE International Conference on Semiconductor Electronics, Proceedings, ICSE Conference paper Cited by 1 Quartile

Abstract

Carbon Nanotubes research is one of the top five hot research topics in physics. It is because of its unique properties and functionalities, which leads to wide-range applications. One of the most interesting potential applications is in term of nanoelectronic device. There is a possibility to found some unique structure, where different carbon nanotubes are connected coaxially. It has been modeled carbon nanotubes heterojunction, which was built from two different carbon nanotubes, that one is metallic and the other one is semiconducting. There are two different carbon nanotubes metal-semiconductor heterojunction. The first one is built from CNT (10,10) as metallic carbon nanotube and CNT (17,0) as semiconductor carbon nanotube. The other one is built from CNT (5,5) as metallic carbon nanotube and CNT (8,0). All of the semiconducting carbon nanotubes are assumed to be a pyridine-like N-doped. Those two heteroj unctions are different in term of their structural shape and diameter. It has been calculated their charge distribution and potential profile, which would be useful for the simulation of their electronic transport properties. The calculations are performed by using self-consistent method to solve Non-Homogeneous Poisson's Equation with aid of Universal Density of States calculation method for Carbon Nanotubes. The calculations are done by varying the doping fraction of the semiconductor carbon nanotubes. It is obtained that the charge are distributed almost evenly along the semiconducting carbon nanotubes and the potential profile peaks in the vincinity of semiconducting carbon nanotubes center position, with some valley-shapes that show some sign of charge confinements nearby. However, from the comparison of two different heterojunctions, it could be inferred that the geometrical aspects of the heterojunction building blocks has effect on their electronic transport parameter. It is also obtained the calculation results of the electron tunneling transmission coefficient that transported through the heterojunction, which has energy lower than the potential barrier value. © 2006 IEEE.

Affiliations

Laboratory for Physics of Electronic Material, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Bandung 40132, Jl. Ganesha 10, Indonesia; Department of Physics, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI), Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung 40154, Jl. dr. Setiabudhi 229, Indonesia; Department of Physics, Universitas Haluoleo, Palu, Indonesia; Department of Physics, Universitas Syiah Kuala, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Research at a Glance

Premium content — register to unlock

Research at a Glance

Register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Premium content — register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Register to unlock

Collaboration

Premium content — register to unlock

Collaboration

Register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Premium content — register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Register to unlock

References Overview

Premium content — register to unlock

References Overview

Register to unlock

Journal & Source

Premium content — register to unlock

Journal & Source

Register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Premium content — register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Register to unlock